000 a Earth Inwogro_min    Freedom  000s Spacer 3000 Logobanner 25

Home   Energy   Water   Work   Economy    Solutions    Politics   Team   Products   Recycling   Cars   Ships   Aircrafts   Promotion 

World    Pollution   Air   Weather   Violence    Women    Weapons   Psychology    Plants   Animals   Food    Peace   Faith    Imprint 

English
Deutsch

Politics

I prefer a constructive cooperation in the team

CapitalismSocialismEcologismPragmatism

Pragmatism   
1.
philosophically: A philosophical school founded by Peirce and James, which proposes a secure construction of knowledge through the combination of mathematical-logical and scientific methodology
2. generally: An attitude that focuses only on factual circumstances and practical action

A fight black against red could win green, but could they also lead a national economy?

It is true that the most capitalists have always maintained that "capitalism" is the only correct way and greed the only actionable character of man. Significant for these people is also the claim that only a patriarchal hierarchical or even despotic leadership style is the right one.

However, this brings us now to the brink of ruin, because capitalism automatically leads to uncontrolled mass production and greed into mass consumption, and as it always ends, we know also, world economic crises, hunger, misery, wars. This is largely due to the leadership style. One head to think is not enough. A team thinks better and more effectively.

The socialists could not really convince in the past, if only because this so-called socialism was merely a socialist dictatorship. Although there was less production there, unfortunately to the chagrin of the citizens, but the pollution was and is often much higher in these states

However, it should be noted that the capitalists do not make the socialists rise, fight socialism like an enemy, because they all fear for their private property.

This is probably the sticking point, John Maynard Keynes was one of the proponents of compensation by taxes rather than trying to change the characters. This would have been a good thing ... but at the moment the climate is changing.

The climate is changing, the problems are becoming more complex and have to be solved in a completely new way. Now many people see the consequences of this policy, the consequences of mass production, monoculture plantations, factory farming and an inappropriate with the environment, they merge in new "green" parties and make legitimate demands.

Due to the upcoming problems whose fierceness will surely cause even more suffering in the future, the citizens of the future will deselect the conservative parties if they do not adapt and help solve the problems of the here and now. As the movement of the children "Fridays for futur" Initiated by Greta Thunberg is showing to us, the so-called adults.

However, this does not work without socialist tendencies. How should this work under capitalism? At best green-painted compromises would come out, because we would have to increase the profits further to the infinite, and produce more and more. This would lead to real garbage mountains that nobody could dismantle anymore because this would not be affordable in capitalism.

But that the Green parties would be able to lead economies may also be strongly doubted. Especially as these parties obviously believe that they do not have to change the system, that is, capitalism. No, here it really needs the new socialists who have already incorporated a genuine democratic and ecological thinking with their new policy.


To the top    To the top

Home   Energy   Water   Work   Economy    Solutions    Politics   Team   Products   Recycling   Cars   Ships   Aircrafts   Promotion 

World    Pollution   Air   Weather   Violence    Women    Weapons   Psychology    Plants   Animals   Food    Peace   Faith    Imprint