000 a Earth Inwogro_min    Freedom  000s Spacer 3000 Logobanner 25

Home   Energy   Water   Work   Economy    Solutions    Politics   Team   Products   Recycling   Cars   Ships   Aircrafts   Promotion 

World    Pollution   Air   Weather   Violence    Women    Weapons   Psychology    Plants   Animals   Food    Peace   Faith    Imprint 

English
Deutsch

Aircraft

There are alternatives: Electric air plane Alice

Eviation introduces with Alice the first fully electric powered aircraft. At first only for 8 people, but it is a small miracle what the engineers have succeeded. This is what our future looks like, Instead of making long speeches, there was in Israel made. That's how I know Israel. Right from the beginning, Israel has relied on electric power, producing solar power plants and desalination plants. Now, they build the most modern aircraft in the world. Bravo Israel, very good made, I am highly proud of you. That's the way it has to be, not blather but act.

Electric airplane Alice

Source: Eviation

Solar-Air-Ships

A really old possibility is the idea of Count Zeppelin, it was and is a wonderful solution and now it also shows that these airships are the most economical solution. An aircraft of conventional construction is far inferior to the airship in almost all areas. Production, material costs consumption, COČ emission.

Solar-Air-Ships

Source: blogs.solidworks.com

Nanuq and Turtle

Solar airships of the new kind. No longer, in the look of a cigar, now equipped with a large area of photovoltaic panels. Watch the video. No emissions, no fuel, no large runways needed, so must be the future. The real payload here is 30 tons.  corresponds approximately to a number of ~165 people. This can be quite satisfy, especially in terms of non-existent consumption.

Of course, lawmakers have to end the old way. Flights with conventional aircraft must be banned and from the ban only with special permission, at high cost into the sky and that only for a short transitional period That sounds tough at first, but that's the way it has to be. Legislators are responsible for all citizens, not just a few companies. He has to set priorities. What is more important? The health of the people, the protection of humans from environmental disasters? Or the so-called entrepreneurial freedom. I think personal protection stands before the will of companies and investors. If her bustle threatens the world population, an immediate ban is the appropriate measure. Everything else is deliberately negligent body  injury. As far as noise pollution is concerned, the airship, here on the left the so-called turtle, is also far superior to any conventional aircraft. Of course, these airships do not fly as fast as the conventional COČ syringes. But they do not jeopardize or harass anyone and please imagine you would float so beautifully over the landscape. Believe me, after that you never want to fly in a plane any more
(Link to the video about Nanug & Co. in the middle of the picture).

Solarship-Nanuq000s Spacer 1Turtle (in planning)

Again, we see it again: alternatives are available but it is impossible for the airlines to lead this one.

The airlines would have to have money like the farmer hay, as most people think. But that's not the case. Again, the profits made are in the accounts of the shareholders of the airlines. That's the big disadvantage of the stock company. Millions of jobs, which are already threatened by higher profits and lower prices, depend on these ventures. There is no room for urgently needed changes. The old poison spray cans will continue to fly. At best, they now get synthetic fuel (see also air) which reduces the fine dust but continues to produce COČ.

An airline CEO would have to explain precisely to these shareholders that it would be better to Again, we see it again: alternatives are available but it is impossible for the airlines to lead this one.

The airlines would have to have money like the farmer hay, as most people think. But that's not the case. Again, the profits made are in the accounts of the shareholders of the airlines. That's the big disadvantage of the stock company. Millions of jobs, which are already threatened by higher profits and lower prices, depend on these ventures. There is no room for urgently needed changes. The old poison spray cans will continue to fly. At best, they now get synthetic fuel (see also air) which reduces the fine dust but continues to produce COČ.

An airline CEO would have to explain precisely to these shareholders that it would be better to
renounce profits and instead invest in airships and electric aircraft. However, this would only be possible if the legislators demanded a quick end to this, which they did not want to do.

So for a long time everything will stay the same, with or without Greta Thunberg. People will talk and promise change and wait until nothing else can fly, because the weather conditions will not allow it anymore. But then we do not need to build any more airships. Then it is too late to act



To the top     To the top

Home   Energy   Water   Work   Economy    Solutions    Politics   Team   Products   Recycling   Cars   Ships   Aircrafts   Promotion 

World    Pollution   Air   Weather   Violence    Women    Weapons   Psychology    Plants   Animals   Food    Peace   Faith    Imprint